The nation states of India and Pakistan have deprecated their relationship to the brink of an unprecedented conflict. War-mongering has become ubiquitous on social as well as ‘the social’ media, with the easy stroke of a key.

News presenters have left no stone unturned to twist facts in order to present a syrup of hatred towards the state of Pakistan. With former military personnel emotionally pleading for an outright war to politicians flaunting demands of nuclear detonations in Pakistani territory, we seem to have outlived the romantic silence of peace.

The job of a soldier is not like any other. The very enlistment into service foresees the ultimate reality of life, that is death, in order for the safety of strangers far away. But what I find appalling is the apparent nonchalance and callousness with which the very same strangers, the protected, decide the fate of soldiers.

The vast majority who comment on social media trying to boost the narrative of military conflict, take for granted the service of our military. The safety and comfort of our sofa does not even make us flinch as we charge those characters through the barrel of our keyboard. 

It is as if we, the taxpayers, who’d rather not enlist in military service, hire other people, through salary paid by our taxes, to fight for us and risk their lives. And to be frank, most of these soldiers do not come from affluent families that can afford the luxury to type in 140 characters in order to show their patriotism. 

“A huge preponderant majority of us with no risk whatsoever of exposure to military service have, in effect, hired some of the least advantaged of our fellow countrymen to do some of the most dangerous business while the majority goes on with their own affairs unbloodied and undistracted.”  – David M. Kennedy, said in an American context that doesn’t seem far from being suitable in India.

Most privileged young people in India do not opt for military service. For most of us who actually have real options, the prospect of martyrdom isn’t enough of an incentive to serve the country. However, we use our assumed right over the lives of soldiers, to perpetuate a narrative that sends them into harms way. For this, we opt to enlist in a self-righteous commentary ‘service’, instead. 

If unfettered love for India or unquestionable hatred for Pakistan is the sole criterion for patriotism, then why don’t these war-mongers serve in the Army. You’d say, military has specific physical demands. Sure, but doesn’t the same patriotism that vomits hatred and urges war catalyse their senses to prepare themselves physically for the same martyrdome that they so carelessly talk about. Let alone actual enlistment into service, our Army recruitment centers should be brimming with a sea of ‘warriors’. Maybe that, the applying for service alone, would further decorate their plate of ‘medals’ and increment their patriotism which they so vehemently project daily. 

This conflict would never have escalated if the children of policy- makers, parliamentarians, political commentators and news presentators had to share the burden of fighting the wars they so desperately wish to perpetuate. I don’t expect more than a miniscule percentage of them to have a son or daughter serving in the military or have plans to enlist.

The fact that the most active-duty soldiers come from poor backgrounds makes it relatively easy for the government to commit the troops into conflict in the name of protecting a population that scarcely breaks a sweat in deliberation while tweeting.

The glorification of death in combat by the hyper-nationalist media with live telecasts of funerals has made the daily flow of coffins wrapped in national flags a normal discourse. What is left unnoticed in most of these live telecasted funerals of our brave soldiers are the poor family members in shoddy clothes sobbing in pain? 

What is left unnoticed is that, not one funeral takes place in a posh housing society or a bungalow of an affluent family? Once these well-decorated government bungalows of politicians and posh apartments of media elites feel the crushing cries of death and scarcity of a loved one, the warmongering will begin to cease. 

As long as Indians are sent into conflict, shouldn’t everyone be, at least theoretically, equally exposed to military recruitment and not just those in dire economic circumstances?


14 thoughts on “Rich’s war, Poor’s fight – The Inequalities of A Military Conflict

  1. Joining armed forces is choice not compulsion ,they are given best facilities let it be medical ,ration , etc , soldier is meant to be in war ,so nothing great ,regarding inequalities it was ,and will be there mindset of low rank soldiers is to be like that of a villager then only he will obey orders else will revolt , I am a soldier by choice not by compulsion , yes I support military training for one and all .

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I am not arguing choice vs compulsion of military service here. All I said is that the warmongering will be far less if people actually had the exposure to life in conflict areas.

      I guess you misread my point.


        1. You seem to take everything literally!

          Exposure can be just educational exposure – how many political commentators actually know a thing or two about the history of Indo-Pak conflict when they demand war almost daily?

          And what’s wrong with tourism in Syria or Iraq? Maybe get a taste of their own medicine!


            1. Again I’m not trying to solve the Pakistan issue nor am I trying to say that war is unnecessary.

              I am trying to highlight the socially unequal composition of the army and how it facilitates war-mongering.


Let's have a Conversation ☺

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s